Women face web accessibility issues including inadequate image alt text, poor contrast/fonts, lack of keyboard navigation, absent captions, complex forms/menus, unpredictable layouts, non-compliant documents, missing complex image descriptions, harmful blinking content, and limited customization. These barriers affect those with visual, motor, hearing, cognitive disabilities or photosensitivity.
What Common Web Accessibility Barriers Do Women with Disabilities Face?
Women face web accessibility issues including inadequate image alt text, poor contrast/fonts, lack of keyboard navigation, absent captions, complex forms/menus, unpredictable layouts, non-compliant documents, missing complex image descriptions, harmful blinking content, and limited customization. These barriers affect those with visual, motor, hearing, cognitive disabilities or photosensitivity.
Empowered by Artificial Intelligence and the women in tech community.
Like this article?
Web Accessibility Standards
Interested in sharing your knowledge ?
Learn more about how to contribute.
Inadequate Text Alternatives for Images
Women with visual impairoriasis often encounter obstacles when websites neglect to provide appropriate alt text for images. This lack of descriptive text makes it impossible for screen readers to convey the content, leaving visually impaired users without important information.
Poor Contrast and Font Choices
Websites with low contrast between text and background colors or those using small, difficult-to-read fonts pose significant accessibility barriers. This design choice can especially impact women with low vision, making it challenging to read or understand content.
Lack of Keyboard Navigation Support
Women with motor disabilities who rely on keyboard navigation instead of a mouse face obstacles when websites do not support comprehensive keyboard shortcuts. This limitation restricts their ability to interact with web content fully and independently.
Missing or Inadequate Captions for Multimedia
For women with hearing impairments, videos or audio content without captions or transcriptions are inaccessible. This barrier not only excludes them from accessing information but also from participating in multimedia experiences.
Complex Forms and Navigation Menus
Navigation menus or forms that are overly complex or not designed with accessibility in mind can be particularly challenging for women with cognitive disabilities. Confusing layouts and instructions can lead to a frustrating user experience and prevent successful interaction with the website.
Inconsistent and Unpredictable Website Layouts
Websites that lack a consistent structure can be difficult to navigate for women with visual or cognitive disabilities. Predictable layouts and straightforward navigation paths are crucial for enabling these users to find the information they seek without confusion.
Non-Compliant PDFs and Documents
Many women with disabilities encounter barriers when websites offer content in PDFs or other document formats that are not accessible. Non-compliant documents cannot be easily read by screen readers, denying access to important information contained within.
Absence of Detailed Descriptions for Complex Images
When complex images, charts, or graphs are presented without detailed descriptions, women with visual impairments are left without a way to understand the conveyed information. Detailed textual explanations are necessary to make these visual elements accessible.
Flashing or Blinking Content and Advertisements
Flashing or blinking content can be a barrier for women with photosensitive epilepsy or autism. Such animations can trigger seizures or significantly increase discomfort and distractibility, making web navigation difficult or even dangerous.
Limited Options for Customizing User Experience
Websites that do not offer options for customizing the user experience, like altering font size or color schemes, can be particularly inaccessible for women with specific visual needs. The lack of personalization options can make web content hard to interact with or view.
What else to take into account
This section is for sharing any additional examples, stories, or insights that do not fit into previous sections. Is there anything else you'd like to add?